|
"......the seedy world of intelligence" Author: Virginia McClaughry, Posted: Mon 23 Sep 2002 1:18 am Subject: "......the seedy world of intelligence" Now that I have Joe Lisa's book (Mike knows Joe from his GO days BTW), I see he is quite the investigator, I am really enjoying what I have read so far. When Mike came back from a leave of absence, back in the early 80's, and found that the GO was disbanded and GO members were given various offers of where to work, as well as that they could just "leave', Mike said that people were asking each other, what are you going to do. Mike asked Joe, who answered that he was going to write a book about the AMA. Looks like he did just that. It's funny how things work out... In particular I found the following interesting, especially in relation to the use of multiple "identities", etc. etc, in an ongoing black propaganda campaign against Mike, I, first, then David when he came along..etc. Having multiple "people" generate multiple "reports" that seem to be the "public opinion", is something we are all becoming more and more familiar with, as the investigation into such, continues. 
Also the points on the use of "front groups", which brings to mind to me as similarities, FZAOINT, FZINT, Frei Zone e.V., Knowledgism, ICAUSE, FZUSA, and even now the "Scientology Religion", etc. etc. On Page 44 of P. Joseph Lisa's book, The Assault on Medical Freedom, he says the following: (referring to earlier mentioned actions of Doyl Taylor, prior to the 1975 dissolution of his department) "In the seedy world of intelligence this is known as "multiple reports." One creates outlets from outside one's immediate area, and then points to these reports as evidence that there is a "national movement" or "public opinion" against one's target in a campaign. Another way of doing this is to create either a front group or a cover organization to carry on one's campaign. In the case of a front group, one simply helps to start up a group which parallels one's own organization. One then can feed that group money or information or both. The front group usually has a different name, but its function is the same. It is always run by someone who knows what the group is all about. This leader is usually in direct communication with the group that helped set it up, so as to continue to receive support from the originating organization. An example of such an operation would be the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) setting up a front group such as Radio Free Moscow to trasnmit propaganda into the USSR. Radio Free Moscow would receive funding covertly, and the people who would run the operation would also be CIA operatives or employees. The role and mission would be known to all who work there. However the function and mission of a cover organization or group would be totally different. Upon cursory inspection it would appear to be just what it was held up to be. The employees of a cover group would not necessarily know what the group was really all about. The person heading the organization would know, but the link between this person and the organization he or she was truly working for would be totally hidden. Usually the group would be a self-supporting entity and no money trail would ever be found going back to the original group that set it all up." Last edited by Virginia McClaughry on Tue 24 Sep 2002 3:59 pm; edited 2 times in total Author: misiunas, Posted: Mon 23 Sep 2002 12:41 pm Subject: Hi Virginia. An investigator, always has an eye for these sorts of things. (big blinking eye goes here) 
Author: misiunas, Posted: Mon 23 Sep 2002 12:45 pm Subject: ...and no. This isn't a multiple report. 
Thanks for posting that. You knew this data quite well, and showed it, on the old, old Forum. The House of Cards. Author: Virginia McClaughry, Posted: Tue 24 Sep 2002 4:00 pm Subject: Paul,
Virginia |
