|
FZA Archive » Free Zone America Forum 2003 » Observation And Determination » Examination And Understanding
The Free Zone A Current In Time Author: misiunas, Posted: Fri 20 Sep 2002 3:02 pm Subject: The Free Zone: A Current In Time The following is a sample of the type of data that can be extracted from the Document library. Over time, a clearer picture can be seen of some particular aspect of interest in contrast to the near sightedness of one particular event, current or not. This is in regard to the Free Zone. My comments begin with *. A non-interference zone (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1390) The Free Zone Decree : 10 Nov 1982 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1372) "The planet known as Teegeeack - local dialect "Earth" or Terra - Sun 12, Sector 9, is hereby declared a Free Zone. No political interference in its affairs from any other part of the Sector or Galaxy will be tolerated. No economic interference in its affairs will be tolerated from any non-planetary agency or power. All of its inhabitants are hereby declared Free Zone Citizens and free of external political or economic interference. The regulating agency of this decree is the Galactic Patrol Sector 9, Sector Commander Elron Elray and his designated representatives. The planet is henceforth under the Sole Auspices of the Galactic Patrol, Sector 9, for coordination with Galactic and Sector Affairs and for compliance with this decree. The Technical and Ethical experiments in progress on Teegeeack are not affected by this decree and are to continue under the auspices of the Galactic Patrol, Sector9..." Sector Operations Bulletin No. 18 : 19 Jan 1984 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1389) CBR Tape Transcript Q&A: "Q 20. Is it this group I've been hearing about, who can handle this mess and act and get the people of Earth to wake up and choose their own destiny as citizens of a Free Zone planet taking its place in the society of the Galactic Civilization and playing a survival, expansion, flourish and prosper, fun game called "The New Civilization Game". - Is not it the group known as the Galactic Patrol? A 20. Yes." * The Galactic Patrol has the responsibility of carrying out the purposes and intents of the 'Free Zone Decree'. Earth is considered a Free Zone planet which has the right to decide it's own future. 'Free Zone' and 'Non-Interference' go hand-in-hand. Sector Operations Bulletin No. 19 : 20 Feb 1984 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1390) CBR says: "...The results are already conclusive. Scientology and Dianetics are flourishing and prospering in the Free Zone (outside the Church)..." * The church, and everyone else for that matter, can be considered to be in the Free Zone. After all, we all live on this planet, don't we? Here we see that Scn and Dn are doing what it is that they were intended to do. Sector Operations Bulletin No. 19 : 20 Feb 1984 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1390) CBR says: "Most importantly, with the Free Zone Decree came the opportunity for the inhabitants of Earth to decide their own destiny. The definition of a Free Zone Planet is: "One that may choose its own political or economic affiliation or choose to remain independent and represented thusly in the Grand Council. Such choices to be made in suitable referendum of its populations after representative chosen leaders of the various subgroups of its populations have engaged in free testimony and discussion of the merits and shortcomings of each proposed course of action. The planet shall remain Free Zone until such referendum is correctly and ethically held. A free Zone Planet is under the auspices of the Galactic Patrol Authority of the Sector in which it is situated, their authority limited to their purpose and the definition herein stated."" * It can't get any clearer than that. Sector Operations Bulletin No. 19 : 20 Feb 1984 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1390) CBR says: "The Markabians left on Earth will be forced to go along with the New Civilization as technically they are Free Zone Citizens..." * Technically, everyone on the planet is a Free Zone Citizen. Technically, but not in fact. Sector Operations Bulletin No. 20 : 21 Feb 1984 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1391) CBR says: "All Free-Zone Citizens of Planet Earth are hereby warned of the conspiracy to suppress personal freedom by the creation of a police state and are enjoined to refuse to cooperate with the steps being taken toward the enslavement of Earth. * We are being warned that not all is as it appears to be. Technical Briefing Number 6 : (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1615) CBR says: "...And of course there is the BEST idea, just like we do it in the Free Zone, sometimes called the Independent Scientology Movement. Why don't we just REMAIN independent. That'll be a FREE ZONE PLANET. Hey, now that's the BEST idea! See?..." * Here we see the introduction of applying the term 'Free Zone' to specific entities within it. But also notice that the HIGHER purpose is not lost - a Free Zone PLANET. It seems that some have already misapplied the purposes of the 'Free Zone Decree' with 'Independent' movements. TELEPATHY SEMINAR : 27 Oct 1984 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1715) CBR says: "...Go to some of the Free Zone Independent Groups and they will give you the processing and training necessary that will help you with these abilities." * Remember, these are "Independent Groups" WITHIN the Free Zone. They do not make up it's totality. [ref: 1610] TELEPATHY SEMINAR : 27 Oct 1984 CBR says: "...And these places exist in the "independent" - or what we call the Free Zone in Germany and other countries of Europe...." * Again, these "independents" are being GROUPED under the Free Zone Decree. The New Civilization - OT Convention 88 : 1988 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1401) CBR says: "And our vector is essentially to bring the New Civilization awareness to the planet and to present to them the rules of the Free-Zone Decree which means that everyone must be brought up to the point where they can decide for themselves on which way the planet goes. Free Zone Decree and the New Civilization Idea with it are both in that flow. Because the Free Zone Decree applies to all of these. The Free Zone Decree applies to all. IF you read it in Sector 9 you see it does apply to the whole planet. But, the idea we are implementing it with is the idea of a New Civilization, because the old one didn't work very well." * Here CBR is again emphasizing the purposes and intents of the Free Zone Decree. The Decree is applicable to ALL. UFO Lecture 2 : 1990 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1405) CBR says: "So there's a third group, a real alternative 3, who control people through truth and freedom so they can control themselves. And that's what we call The Free Zone. You have around Europe and in Australia and in South America and in the United States several of these places. Now in between all of these are the mass of humanity that are being tried to be controlled by all the other groups. And we know why. And we are the only ones that know why, 'cause they won't tell you..."; * The Free Zone is being described as the 'real alternative 3'. In other words, he is referring to the Free Zone Decree. UFO Lecture 2 : 1990 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1405) CBR says: "I think that you might all agree at this point that an idea can influence a whole civilization. And the idea of a free zone planet where everyone can choose for themselves, if they know all the data, I think you'll agree that that's a pretty good idea." * The key phrase: "if they know all the data". * * * That's the end of the CBR excerpts concerning the Free Zone. Let's see how the 'Free Zone' comes to be redefined over time. The following extracts are samples of that redefinition. THE FREE ZONE : 1992 ca. (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1198) Electra writes: "The Free Zone is a huge sprawling loosely connected system of Independent Scientologists, those who were either once part of the Church and left or were booted out, and those who came into Scientology through contact with the Free Zone." * Here is where the term 'Free Zone' begins to be redefined by calling it something else - a "loosely connected system". The 'Free Zone Decree' makes no mention of any type of system or order. What begins to happen here is that the idea of a 'Free Zone' 'system' is being confused with the actual purpose and intent of the 'Free Zone Decree'. The proper terminology to use to create a logical relation for understanding purposes, is to say that the 'Independent Scientologists' and the 'loosely connected system' are both WITHIN the Free Zone, but the Free Zone is NOT those things mentioned. Clear-L LIST : 14 Jun 1993 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=165) Homer Wilson Smith writes: "The Church is violently and fanatically opposed to independent Scientology, the so called 'field' or 'Free Zone'..." * In fact, the 'field' has nothing to do with the Free Zone other than of being WITHIN the Free Zone and under the influence of the Free Zone Decree. Joe : 17 Feb 1994 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=55) Homer Wilson Smith relays: "About our group in short: It is called "Freie Zone e.V." (Free Zone registered Assoc.). Here an extract of our self-description. It's members come from various scn-traditions as you might call it. Purpose is not the defence of a single scn-direction but to set up a kind of umbrella organization. Goals This association is an initiative by the supporters of cognition-philosophies. A philosophy of cognition has to do with the change and devolpment of persons through self-achieved cognitions..." * Here we see that Freie Zone e.V. has been established for purposes other the those stated in the Free Zone Decree. 1) Cognitions have nothing to do with spiritual gain. 2) What is the purpose of an 'umbrella organization' when the Free Zone Decree already covers it all? 3) This is the killer: "Purpose is not the defence of a single scn-direction". Off track and off Scn. Freezone - clarification of nomenclature : 08 Oct 1996 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=73) Ralph Hilton writes; "The "Freezone" is a term coined by W. B. Robertson, a former high ranking Sea Org member. The following is a statement he issued relating to the creation of the "Freezone". Generally people who have left the church and practice scientology in some form or another refer to themselves as "Independent Scientologists" or by the name of their own offshoot group and prefer not to be associated with Robertson's somewhat unusual set of beliefs. I don't know of anyone who posts to a.r.s. that is part of the "Freezone" as detailed below. "Elron Elray" is the name W.B.R. uses for Hubbard." [Free Zone Decree followed] * The prolific newsgroups author, Ralph Hilton, states that "Independents" do not consider themselves a part of the Free Zone. Here he downgrades the Free Zone concept by saying it is a "somewhat unusual set of beliefs". The credibility of the Free Zone Decree is questioned. Re: What's in a name? was: Re: An E-Meter Story : 10 May 1997 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1747) ladyv (Enid) writes: "...To me Free Zone includes all technologies of the spirit, whether I agree with them or not. It is FREE. If you are a student of the Spirit, you are a Free Zoner to me. This is how I use it and what I mean by it." * Enid interprets the Free Zone Decree to refer to SPECIFIC technologies of the spirit. Not just one, but ANY 'technology' of the spirit. Now Scn's credibility is questioned. Re: Free Zone : 04 Aug 1998 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=174) Ralph Hilton writes: "The term Free Zone has come to include 2 meanings. One is those practicing scn outside the CofS as a fairly generic term. Originally the term was used by Bill Robertson to refer to the organizations he set up." * Here we have Ralph boldly redefining the 'Free Zone'. Now, the Free Zone has come to mean something mundane and valueless. Further, he cements the idea that the Free Zone is just an organization that CBR dreamed up. My, how far the 'Free Zone' has come! Re: Free Zone : 07 Aug 1998 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=175) Joe Harrington writes: "Yes, I agree the generic term "Free Zone" is prone to confusion and misunderstanding. I do a lot of independent research and auditing geared toward the alleviation of the adverse effects of Hubbard's "standard tech", however I reject being classified in a vague "Free Zone" category." * In typical black propaganda style, we have supporters coming out with 'validating' statements in order to further emphasize their hidden agenda. The Free Zone, as defined by the Free Zone Decree, has now come to mean something completely opposite of it's purpose and intent. The Free Zone concept has been dragged down from a 7th dynamic activity and smashed into the 1st dynamic, altered, discredited and made 'valueless'. Re: Free? Zone : 09 Feb 2000 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=26) Ralph Hilton writes: "I would say that getting auditing in the FZ is far more dangerous than in the CofS." * And now the propagandized 'Free Zone' is made to be 'dangerous'. Making an alteration dangerous is not bad in and of itself because that would be close to the truth. But truth is even better than being close to the truth. The truth is that the propagandized 'Free Zone' IS dangerous. The truth is that the Free Zone Decree defines the Free Zone, and quite clearly. If anything else comes to be called the 'Free Zone', then alteration is taking place. To summarize: 1) A clear picture of the Free Zone is made. 2) True to warning, the term 'Free Zone' comes to be interpreted as being something else. 3) That interpretation, being referred to as the actual interpretation, is discredited. 4) Few understand what the term 'Free Zone' means, but most do understand some altered form of it. The Free Zone, despite all of these attempts at sabotage, has and will continue, to create a free planet where it's citizens have the full right of deciding their own future. There are those "who control people through truth and freedom so they can control themselves" and then there are those who control people through lies and deception so that EVERYONE will become a controlled slave. Time has a way of creating forgetfullness and there are those who use that forgetfullness to help fullfill their own agenda. There is only one way to combat that forgetfulness and the resulting restriction of freedom. Be ever vigilant. There is another way of boiling this down. If you are not associated with the Galactic Patrol, in some way, then your motives for a 'Free Zone' are suspect, as it is that organization that has the responsibility of ensuring a Free Zone. And if your understanding of the definition of 'Free Zone' has come to be what is popularly accepted, then you have strayed off course. Stay the course. Author: misiunas, Posted: Fri 20 Sep 2002 3:52 pm Subject: Now I know that Freie Zone e.V. has probably altered it's purpose line over the years, but I am curious as to exactly WHO created that 'registered association'. In light of the Nordenholtz introduction, the 'cognition based philosophy' idea of theirs looks like it continues today. I wonder who is operating that 'invisible' umbrella? If being afraid of the CoS is the reason to hide identities, then here's a good one: Look at me, who am I? Author: Virginia McClaughry, Posted: Sun 22 Sep 2002 10:09 pm Subject: This is a bit rough form wise, but it's a start. [quote="misiunas"]The following is a sample of the type of data that can be extracted from the Document library. Over time, a clearer picture can be seen of some particular aspect of interest in contrast to the near sightedness of one particular event, current or not. This is in regard to the Free Zone. My comments begin with *. * * * That's the end of the CBR excerpts concerning the Free Zone. Let's see how the 'Free Zone' comes to be redefined over time. The following extracts are samples of that redefinition. THE FREE ZONE : 1992 ca. (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1198) Electra writes: "The Free Zone is a huge sprawling loosely connected system of Independent Scientologists, those who were either once part of the Church and left or were booted out, and those who came into Scientology through contact with the Free Zone." * Here is where the term 'Free Zone' begins to be redefined by calling it something else - a "loosely connected system". The 'Free Zone Decree' makes no mention of any type of system or order. What begins to happen here is that the idea of a 'Free Zone' 'system' is being confused with the actual purpose and intent of the 'Free Zone Decree'. The proper terminology to use to create a logical relation for understanding purposes, is to say that the 'Independent Scientologists' and the 'loosely connected system' are both WITHIN the Free Zone, but the Free Zone is NOT those things mentioned. I say: Ok, I think I will take up the timing of this initial propaganda by redefinition of terms, By "Electra". Which appears to be right around the beginning of 1992. Electra's first post that was found, is on January 1, 1992, as follows: From: Electra@vfz.earth.com Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: (none) Message-ID: <1jan92-13107@vfz.earth.com> Date: 1 Jan 92 03:38:49 GMT Sender: Electra@vfz.earth.com Reply-To: Electra@vfz.earth.com Followup-To: This list Organization: A Voice of the Free Zone Lines: 2 Hello Also, another early post by Electra is signed "Sir Electra", the use of "Sir" is usually a male reference-although not always. The way "sir" is used in this signature is reminiscent of a possibly self-imposed rank of "knight". This post (which I have snipped most of) has quite a bit of discussion about e-meter's, building of etc. This tends to narrow down potential "people" that Electra either is, or is closely associated with. Ralph Hilton, and Homer Wilson Smith come to mind immediately, as examples of persons expressing interest in construction, etc., of meters. Narrowing even further, Ralph Hilton to this day, discusses the feasibility of manufacturing em-meters outside the "Church". Compare that information to the excerpted statement by "Electra" below: "I buy them and fix them and sell them all the time." Another point of note: is the statement before the signature, that I have included as well. Many subtle, and not so subtle vectors in that statement. See post: From: Electra@vfz.earth.com (Electra@vfz.earth.com) Subject: (none) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Date: 1992-01-18 11:30:31 PST "I buy them and fix them and sell them all the time." "There are things worse on this planet than the Church of Scientology. Sir Electra" Clear-L LIST : 14 Jun 1993 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=165) Homer Wilson Smith writes: "The Church is violently and fanatically opposed to independent Scientology, the so called 'field' or 'Free Zone'..." * In fact, the 'field' has nothing to do with the Free Zone other than of being WITHIN the Free Zone and under the influence of the Free Zone Decree. Joe : 17 Feb 1994 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=55) Homer Wilson Smith relays: "About our group in short: It is called "Freie Zone e.V." (Free Zone registered Assoc.). Here an extract of our self-description. It's members come from various scn-traditions as you might call it. Purpose is not the defence of a single scn-direction but to set up a kind of umbrella organization. Goals This association is an initiative by the supporters of cognition-philosophies. A philosophy of cognition has to do with the change and devolpment of persons through self-achieved cognitions..." * Here we see that Freie Zone e.V. has been established for purposes other the those stated in the Free Zone Decree. 1) Cognitions have nothing to do with spiritual gain. 2) What is the purpose of an 'umbrella organization' when the Free Zone Decree already covers it all? 3) This is the killer: "Purpose is not the defence of a single scn-direction". Off track and off Scn. Freezone - clarification of nomenclature : 08 Oct 1996 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=73) Ralph Hilton writes; "The "Freezone" is a term coined by W. B. Robertson, a former high ranking Sea Org member. The following is a statement he issued relating to the creation of the "Freezone". Generally people who have left the church and practice scientology in some form or another refer to themselves as "Independent Scientologists" or by the name of their own offshoot group and prefer not to be associated with Robertson's somewhat unusual set of beliefs. I don't know of anyone who posts to a.r.s. that is part of the "Freezone" as detailed below. "Elron Elray" is the name W.B.R. uses for Hubbard." [Free Zone Decree followed] * The prolific newsgroups author, Ralph Hilton, states that "Independents" do not consider themselves a part of the Free Zone. Here he downgrades the Free Zone concept by saying it is a "somewhat unusual set of beliefs". The credibility of the Free Zone Decree is questioned. Re: What's in a name? was: Re: An E-Meter Story : 10 May 1997 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=1747) ladyv (Enid) writes: "...To me Free Zone includes all technologies of the spirit, whether I agree with them or not. It is FREE. If you are a student of the Spirit, you are a Free Zoner to me. This is how I use it and what I mean by it." * Enid interprets the Free Zone Decree to refer to SPECIFIC technologies of the spirit. Not just one, but ANY 'technology' of the spirit. Now Scn's credibility is questioned. Re: Free Zone : 04 Aug 1998 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=174) Ralph Hilton writes: "The term Free Zone has come to include 2 meanings. One is those practicing scn outside the CofS as a fairly generic term. Originally the term was used by Bill Robertson to refer to the organizations he set up." * Here we have Ralph boldly redefining the 'Free Zone'. Now, the Free Zone has come to mean something mundane and valueless. Further, he cements the idea that the Free Zone is just an organization that CBR dreamed up. My, how far the 'Free Zone' has come! Re: Free Zone : 07 Aug 1998 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=175) Joe Harrington writes: "Yes, I agree the generic term "Free Zone" is prone to confusion and misunderstanding. I do a lot of independent research and auditing geared toward the alleviation of the adverse effects of Hubbard's "standard tech", however I reject being classified in a vague "Free Zone" category." * In typical black propaganda style, we have supporters coming out with 'validating' statements in order to further emphasize their hidden agenda. The Free Zone, as defined by the Free Zone Decree, has now come to mean something completely opposite of it's purpose and intent. The Free Zone concept has been dragged down from a 7th dynamic activity and smashed into the 1st dynamic, altered, discredited and made 'valueless'. Re: Free? Zone : 09 Feb 2000 (http://fza.org/fzreflib/docref?ref=26) Ralph Hilton writes: "I would say that getting auditing in the FZ is far more dangerous than in the CofS." * And now the propagandized 'Free Zone' is made to be 'dangerous'. Making an alteration dangerous is not bad in and of itself because that would be close to the truth. But truth is even better than being close to the truth. The truth is that the propagandized 'Free Zone' IS dangerous. The truth is that the Free Zone Decree defines the Free Zone, and quite clearly. If anything else comes to be called the 'Free Zone', then alteration is taking place. To summarize: 1) A clear picture of the Free Zone is made. 2) True to warning, the term 'Free Zone' comes to be interpreted as being something else. 3) That interpretation, being referred to as the actual interpretation, is discredited. 4) Few understand what the term 'Free Zone' means, but most do understand some altered form of it. The Free Zone, despite all of these attempts at sabotage, has and will continue, to create a free planet where it's citizens have the full right of deciding their own future. There are those "who control people through truth and freedom so they can control themselves" and then there are those who control people through lies and deception so that EVERYONE will become a controlled slave. Time has a way of creating forgetfullness and there are those who use that forgetfullness to help fullfill their own agenda. There is only one way to combat that forgetfulness and the resulting restriction of freedom. Be ever vigilant. There is another way of boiling this down. If you are not associated with the Galactic Patrol, in some way, then your motives for a 'Free Zone' are suspect, as it is that organization that has the responsibility of ensuring a Free Zone. And if your understanding of the definition of 'Free Zone' has come to be what is popularly accepted, then you have strayed off course. Stay the course.[/quote I say: I wasn't sure if I should add in what I have, to what you have posted, or what, so I'll put these here, in time order with my comments marked I say: (If you want any of these documents for the database-let me know where to send them and I will) All of them will be going on the website at some point, as well. Eulogy page on www.freezone.de "Capt. Bill Robertson died on 12th of May 1991" 1991 In 1991 we founded the "Freie Zone e.V." as a registered association. -Bernd In 1991, short after Bill Robertson died, we started the Free Zone Association.-Bernd 1993 EXCERPT From: Homer Wilson Smith (homer@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU) Subject: FL-CB Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology, alt.clearing.technology View: (This is the only article in this thread) | Original Format Date: 1993-05-07 10:16:37 PST -- Eulogy for Captain Bill -- (written May 1991 by Flemming Funch for Free Spirit) Captain Bill died the 12th of May 1991. Another of the great spirits from the history of Scientology and the independent field passed on to other playing fields. William Branton Robertson was born the 2nd of December 1936 in Georgia. He grew up mostly in New Orleans where he also went to college. He became an engineer and worked as such for a number of years. I say: This appears to be the exact same eulogy found on www.freezone.de. Also, Flemming Funch has recently been accessing Mike's websites, I believe it was Friday or Saturday. Note that Maria is NOT referred to as CBR's wife, so we can probably safely assume they are not married per se. 1994 Excerpt from post by Joe Harrington 17 May "I¥m still interested to hear what occured in Mar 91, when you have the time" "I learned some interesting data about Capt Bill¥s situation and it certainly filled in some of the missing pieces in my puzzle, and my non-confront of what had to be done" "It would appear I will be picking up the hat of Capt Bill when he left in 92." Title: Letter from the Church Author: Smith, Homer W. Type: Newsgroup Posting Date: 09 Aug 1997 Location: misc.int-property "Captain Bill died in 1994-1995 still loyal to LRH but adamantly opposed to the original Church and its upper management.-Homer" From: Old Timer Subject: Re: Free Zone Association: Legal Alert Date: 1997/08/15 Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970815120429.00683d64@king.cts.com> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.34.1 Organization: Art Matrix - Lightlink Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology "Nov 29, 1996- Bernd Leubeck (President of the Free Zone Association) and the adminisitive contact for the homepage received the following fax from the German law firm of Boehmert and Boehmert which has been roughly translated. Please note: The following fax is the first direct Church related contact made to Bernd and the FZA." I say: So.... Bernd Luebeck is the President of the Frei Zone e.V. Free Zone Report 1/1999 page 1 of 15 Free Zone Report Issue 1/1999 Publisher: registered association Free Zone, PO-BOX 1215, D-83524 Haag i.Obb., Germany E-Mail: fz-report@freezone.de Internet:http://www.freezone.de, http://www.freezone.org, http://www.scientologie.de Excerpt: In 1991 we founded the "Freie Zone e.V." as a registered association. It resulted from the neces-sity to organize ourselves, when the Church of Scientology between about 1988 and 1990 tried more and more intensively to infiltrate single groups of Free Zone. They tried to find alleged copyright-violations to tangle the groups up in legal discussions. Many of you will remember this... Office of Special Affairs ... etc. Based on our network thought, we didn¥t have any hierarchy which concerned itself with these things for all groups. By the registered association Free Zone we built a forum in which we did ba-sic research to the legal position in the working with the materials of LRH. The aim at that time was to understand the legal situation and to find out the prerequisites for one¥s safe working with these materials. I say: Apparently Bernd is the writer of the Freezone Report, and he again makes explanations as to "why" the Freie Zone e.V. was formed. CBR never formed such an association, so perhaps this is part of why Bernd feels the need to convince readers of it's necessity. ----- Original Message ----- From: <fz-de@freezone.de> To: <COSinvestigations@egroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 12:55 AM Subject: [COSinvestigations] non-ex "I was in the GO too between 1976 and 1982. I never really gave up the basic purposes of the GO which is more or less protection of the Free Zone groups.... PR and legal. In 1991, short after Bill Robertson died, we started the Free Zone Association. In that time the church infiltrated quite a few groups here in Europe and we had to defend ourselves against it." "In 1995 we purchased the rights to the work of Nordenholz and republished the book "Scientology, Science of the Constitution and Usefulness of Knowledge", written in 1934. See "http://www.scientologie.de". Since end of last year we are working on a timetrack concerning the Scn movement. It's on the net on our german webserver... "http://www.freezone.de/english/timetrack/tt-index.htm". It's quite a lot of data.... but still a lot of strings have to be pulled. It also includes the early data from Garrison's books "Playing Dirty" and "Hidden Story of Scientology". What interests me is the data about the government involvement in inviltration of the church... labeling Scn as a national security risc, etc... Bernd" I say: In this non-e post to the COSI list,(at that time owned and run by confront23) here we have confirmation by Bernd, that "short after Bill Robertson died", A "we" started the Free Zone Association. With another explanation of why. Bernd's interest in "the data about the government involvement in infiltration to the church", takes on new meaning in light of Bernd's associations. We also appear to have the beginning of parallel vectors, to the vector of The Criminal Time track, (which later became the data section covered on www.scientologyintegrity.org). This is one of the first more visible attempts to eventuallally gain control of Mike and I's motion by the use of parallel vectors, which as Bernd says he began work on a "timetrack" at the end of "last year" (which would have been the end of 1999). Mike began work on timetracking various things, in approximately mid 1999. 2001 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Freezone" <freezone@freezone.de> To: "Virginia McClaughry" <vmcc@icehouse.net> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 1:32 AM Subject: RE: CBR EXCERPT > >How did he die really do you know? > > Yes, he had cancer and he refused medical treatment. In that time he lived in Swizzerland... gave quite some lectures to transfer his technical knowledge to auditors and C/Ses. ml Bernd I say: Ok, so apparently CBR supposedly "died" in "Swizzerland". Erica and Max's neck of the woods. The bit about "he refused medical treatment" sounds very non-scientologist to me for some reason, more like standard psych/doctor party line. ----- Original Message ----- From: Freezone To: virginia Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 1:58 AM Subject: RE: question Bernd, I guess the legal view on copyrights is slightly different between Europe and the US. In Germany as far as I know none else then the actual author can have it. I put Otfried on the cc line because he's a lawyer and he can answer this more korrectly. As far as we are concerned (Free Zone Assoc.) we purchased the rights (rights for distribution, use, etc.) from CBR's heir in 2000. (virginia)*Ok, I'm confused though. Because as you see Erica said there ARE no copyrights, so why would they need to be purchased by the Free Zone Assoc? But also why did the free zone assoc want to buy them anyway, to do what? I don't get this at all.. (bernd) We have to differenciate here... we didn't purchase the copyrights... we purchased the "use and further distribution of the material". The idea behind it was that we don't get in danger in case CBR's heir possibly dies and some inheritant denies us the use of it. Now we are on the legal side of it. We have a contract saying that we are allowed to use the material. I don't know how someone could make a move on it? (virginia) *Yes, with what you said, this seems even more odd now. Perhaps maybe the person was meaning your move in buying the rights? I'll see if I can find out more. But that's the only thing I can think of, except it doesn't make much sense. BTW, who is WE (the Free zone assoc)? I read about it a while back when I was first exploring your site, but I didn't see any names, even though from the newsletter it looks as if there is at least a few people that get together and make decisions or whatever, so I also don't understand what you meant by WE (in your comm above). Meaning is the free zone association run by, you, otfried, erica, max? I figure somebody(or somebodies) must run it, or else it would have never started! LOL (Bernd) A little bit of background to this: End of the 80s/beg. of the 90s the church gave us (the ROs in the german speaking area) a hard time... infiltrating several groups, involving them in copyright violations, etc. There was no third dynamic except the single ROs connected as a network. You know my background a bit... I was in the GO... same as Mike. I thought that there should be a 3D taking care of the ROs... with similar duties as the GO but without command powers... we didn't want to have another hirarchy telling others what to do. So I got 7 people together here in Munich and founded the Assoc. as a legal body. It's registered with the local courts (legal policy here). Then we announced it amongst the ROs and invited people to support us with their membership. Now we have about 100 members... some are voluntary members, not paying any membership fees and others are ordenary members supporting us financially. We use that money for our web-sites... for missions, for legal handlings etc. It's a budged of about 2000$ a year. One purpose of the FZ Assoc was to act as an interface to the society... critics, officials, media etc. Anotherone was to research the possibilities for the ROs to legally deliver without harrassment from the church. Erika, Max, Otfried... they are all members. This is the meaning of "we". Take a look at www.scientology.org for instance... there you can see what the FZ Assoc did concerning the name dispute ofer "scientologie" (the german and french spelling). Last year we won the dispute with the RTC. We even got some media on it: http://www.freezone.org/news/media/media-index.htm. That was one of the actions. Hope this explains it a bit? ml Bernd I say: Note where Bernd says "CBR's heir". The only possible logical person that he could be referring to is Maria, but Maria is not his wife. Even with Common Law marriage, CBR would still have had to have "had" copyrights for them to even be an asset a heir could control. But yet as you see, there don't seem to BE any copyrights. And even if there were, CBR would have had to make a will as to their disposition, Bernd seems uninterested and unknowledgeable in that area, yet he and his association take the time and effort to "purchase the "use...."etc. Something smells there. Almost like establishing a precedent of ownership or "authorized use" of something that technically you couldn't do that with, in the first place. Similar to how the church lost the copyrights, then rewrote everything, copyrighted that, went around gathering up for "tech preservation" every original they could find, then issued in great volume their newer works, after copyrighting them, thereby establishing a precedent as being the CURRENT copyright holders and owners, thereby giving a point to attack from. Complicated, but simple at the same time, if you follow my meaning. ----- Original Message ----- From: Freezone To: virginia Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:57 AM Subject: RE: question EXCERPT (virginia) But I guess I still don't understand why Erica said there are no copyrights on CBR materials, cuz there must be or why would there need to be a contract to buy rights to use something that isn't copyrighted? See my point? (Bernd) Probably because someone has to explicitly get them copyrighted... and also give a copy to some Library? I'dont know. As I said... it's a bit different here in Europe. (virginia) Also, didnt CBR leave a will, it must say in there what is to be done? It would have had to be recorded somewhere I imagine, as part of probate. (bernd) Don't know about it. Never saw it. I say: Note the "end of discussion" there by Bernd on the subject of wills, probate, CBR death etc. "Never saw it" could be because it never existed, is one strong possibility. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph Hilton" <aon.912202928@aon.at> Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:26 PM Subject: Re: FREEZONE AOs COS Fairgames. The Freezone is based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. They can play their silly games in America but have no faintest hope in Hell over here in Europe. -- Ralph Hilton I say: Here we have Ralph putting some locations to where the coopted and propagandized "Freezone" is based. In these areas key personnel-wise we have: Germany: Bernd and Doris Luebeck Otfried Krumpholz Switzerland: Erica and Max Hauri Austria: Ralph Hilton Excerpts from a post of mine: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Virginia" <vmcc@icehouse.net> Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:43 PM Subject: The death of CBR?-questions From Part One, we have the following quotes: Joe Harrington: "I¥m still interested to hear what occured in Mar 91, when you have the time" "I learned some interesting data about Capt Bill¥s situation and it certainly filled in some of the missing pieces in my puzzle, and my non-confront of what had to be done" "It would appear I will be picking up the hat of Capt Bill when he left in 92." I believe this was Homer, in the post to misc.int-property: "Captain Bill died in 1994-1995 still loyal to LRH but adamantly opposed to the original Church and its upper management." We have on www.freezone.de: http://www.freezone.de/english/cbr/e_cbr_pe.htm Capt. Bill Robertson died on 12th of May 1991 "His communicator and life companion over the last 7 years was Maria Maloney, also a long term veteran from the Sea Org." We have Huggie (excerpted) From: Huggie </groups?hl=en&q=author:huggie%40pop.ihug.co.nz+> (huggie@pop.ihug.co.nz <mailto:huggie%40pop.ihug.co.nz>) Subject: Capt. Bill: The White Thetan Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology </groups?hl=en&group=alt.clearing.technology> View this article only </groups?hl=en&selm=3ba82916%40news2.lightlink.com> Date: 2001-09-18 22:11:53 PST >"Another bit where he says his tyre was slashed. > > I was in comm. with a girl who was in his org. She said that he was in > >telepathic comm. with Ron and theta contact, even after he (Ron) died. > >S he also said that Bill died in a speed crash on an autoban. Anyone know > >abt. that?" Now, what is the deal here? We have the freezone page saying the death is 12 May 1991, Homer saying CBR died in 94-95, and Joe referring to some event with CBR in March 1991, and Joe referring to when CBR "left" in 92. Then we have Huggie with data from someone (don't know who), that CBR was killed in speedcrash on the autoban, versus freezone terminals who have said CBR died of cancer. Also, when asked about any will from CBR, the answer is "I don't know", or no answer at all. I say: Note the three different dates given by, respectively, Bernd, Homer, and Joe, for the death/left of CBR. Extrapolating on the intentionally generated "confusion" surrounding CBR's "death", what if CBR didn't "die" at all? Being a Galactic Patrol Officer, and being as how that organization IS in existence, it is entirely likely that CBR was simply picked up, fixed up, and began directly working with Ron, which is what he wanted to do anyway, (from what I understand). Virginia Author: misiunas, Posted: Mon 23 Sep 2002 1:38 pm Subject:
Is there anyone alive that had first-hand knowledge of CBR? I know that Marianne had some training from him, but it doesn't seem that she was part of the 'inner circle', so to speak. That's my opinion, of course. How is it that CBR starts making headway in to a number of areas, and it isn't until AFTER his death that an organization springs up 'defending' him and his work. Strange.
Very good. 
Author: Virginia McClaughry, Posted: Tue 24 Sep 2002 4:04 pm Subject:
I'll move it there, I think there could be more to that subject... How do you get those little boxes with the excerpt in them?? Virginia Author: Virginia McClaughry, Posted: Tue 24 Sep 2002 4:08 pm Subject: RE: COSI posts If you go to the Hasi Intel files, Alan C walter's, there are some COSI posts there that should go in the data base. I'll dig up asap the ones I am using the freezone timetrack, and send you those as well, have to do it anyway to put them in the appropriate person's file. Virginia |
