|
theta Author: starved_artist Posted: 2001-12-04 19:28 a trusted friend of mine is now reading dianetics. based on his current enthusiasm for the topic i imagine that we'll begin to audit each other in the near future. is it possible for us to audit each other to the point of clear? will we be able to help each other reach the state of OT? if dianetic auditing cannot take us through to the highest level of OT training then what training materials do we need to do so, and where can i aquire those materials? i realize that it may take quite a while for us to reach the state of clear, and that since we haven't even started either of our cases yet that it will be a while before we get started with the OT stuff, so i don't absolutely have the have the materials right away. 
Author: curious about ... Posted: 2001-12-04 21:52 Starved Artist Well done on finding a twin. The original LRH bridge was set up to be studied and co-audited. He stated that half of the gains on the bridge were from training. If you have the knowledge you can keep yourself out of the soup again. The levels and NED have been floating around the web for years and should be attainable. Find a good review auditor and CS to help you along. The road is not rough but it is easy to get off on other trails and a trained auditor can clean up the rough spots. A CS/guide will help immensely. They can easily be the same person. (Mine were) The bridge from the Cof$ runs about $250,000 + to OT VIII, if you can get there. Spending a few bucks along the way for professional help here in the Freezone is a pittance for the gain that you will achieve and the increased certainty of getting to your goal. Be Well Author: starved_artist Posted: 2001-12-05 00:13 curious, thanks for the info. you said: "The bridge from the Cof$ runs about $250,000 + to OT VIII, if you can get there." that is exactly why my friend and i plan to audit each other. if i could afford 250,000 then i would be paying for proffessional auditing from the start rather than having my friend audit me and visa versa! "Spending a few bucks along the way for professional help here in the Freezone is a pittance for the gain that you will achieve and the increased certainty of getting to your goal." i understand that, and i would pay for all the professional help at the freezone that i could afford, but at this point i cannot afford anything. 
once again, thanks for your advise. 
Author: virginia Posted: 2001-12-05 00:29 Hmmm what's in here? Oh, no, not again...it's the old here fishie fishie fishie thing. Curious About, are you really this easy of a mark? Because at the rate you fall for things, this is getting up there with Logic18 and some others actually ANSWERING yet another nym of TOm's posts totally done facetiously, as ACTUALLY BEING SERIOUS! Talk about a BEAUTIFUL representation of total literal acceptance of remarks, was right out of Science of Survival. You should reread that book, perhaps more than once. The only trouble an auditor (or I suppose you could say any trained Scientologist) gets into with the tone scale? Estimating TOO HIGH. And no, do NOT interpret this as an "opening" for you to well you know what I mean. I am sincerely trying to point you to some tech you seem to really need. Virginia Oh and Starved? Glad the sig is back on the emotion wavelength size etc. That one definitely fits better. Virginia Author: starved_artist Posted: 2001-12-05 01:10 virginia, "Oh, no, not again...it's the old here fishie fishie fishie thing. Curious About, are you really this easy of a mark? Because at the rate you fall for things, this is getting up there with Logic18 and some others actually ANSWERING yet another nym of TOm's posts totally done facetiously, as ACTUALLY BEING SERIOUS!" an easy mark? Tom's posts? let me set you straight virginia: i am not Tom. my name is Stephen. why don't you take me seriously? you distort the intentions of my posts to meet the criteria of your assumptions... why? i assure you, my posts are allways honest, sincere, and serious. Author: virginia Posted: 2001-12-05 01:16 Starved, Curious About, are you really this easy of a mark? Because at the rate you fall for things, this is getting up there with Logic18 and some others actually ANSWERING yet another nym of TOm's posts totally done facetiously, as ACTUALLY BEING SERIOUS!" Are you saying YOU are Curious about, Starved artist? I mean, you seem to be taking my comm to what apparently was an entirely poster, Curious about, as personally applying to YOU? What's that all about? Either you are Curious about screwing around with a fourth nym, or you misduplicate communication quite badly. As to taking you seriously? Ahem, well, this answer of yours is not exactly in your favor of being taken seriously. Similar to some of your other posts. Anyways, which is it? 1. Starved Artist, IS another nym of whoever is the person who uses the nym of Curious about. or 2. You misduplicate communication badly. Virginia an easy mark? Tom's posts? let me set you straight virginia: i am not Tom. my name is Stephen. why don't you take me seriously? you distort the intentions of my posts to meet the criteria of your assumptions... why? i assure you, my posts are allways honest, sincere, and serious. _________________ _,.-~`~-.,_,.-~`~-.,_,.-~`~-.,__--==[[ s t e p h e n ]]==--__,.-~`~-.,_,.-~`~-.,_,.-~`~-.,_ Author: virginia Posted: 2001-12-05 01:19 Corrected post to Starved Artist, Starved, You excerpted from my post to Curious About: Curious About, are you really this easy of a mark? Because at the rate you fall for things, this is getting up there with Logic18 and some others actually ANSWERING yet another nym of TOm's posts totally done facetiously, as ACTUALLY BEING SERIOUS!" And then you said: an easy mark? Tom's posts? let me set you straight virginia: i am not Tom. my name is Stephen. I say: Are you saying YOU are Curious about, Starved artist? I mean, you seem to be taking my comm to what apparently was an entirely different poster, Curious about, as personally applying to YOU? What's that all about? Either you are Curious about screwing around with a fourth nym, or you misduplicate communication quite badly. As to taking you seriously? Ahem, well, this answer of yours is not exactly in your favor of being taken seriously. Similar to some of your other posts. Anyways, which is it? 1. Starved Artist, IS another nym of whoever is the person who uses the nym of Curious about. or 2. You misduplicate communication badly. Virginia Author: virginia Posted: 2001-12-05 03:46 You know boys and girls..I did a little test on a theory I had here. A little here fishie fishie of my own. So here is the report on what happened. It went like this.. A little background first (by no means complete): I had observed quite a while back, that Starved Artist is not what he appears, first of all he says he lives in Bend, but doesn't know about the bypass (kind of hard to miss if you EVER go into town). Also, Starved used the now tired, and overused "I'm just a guy who read a dianetics book" cover, recently used by the man of many nyms, Tom Bombadil/joman/barry/benny/bill/etc. etc. You know, the guy who had tried to run an Op on Mike and I, over a 10 month time period. See thread on old board, What about Tom. So, I already had documented that curious about believes and espouses just about any enemy line that comes his way, and then I see these "replacement" "I'm just a guy who...." posters, of which Starved is only one. I also noticed that Curious about would never fail to fall for any old 1.1 agent that came along, and Starved artist was no exception. Except, there was something else. To experiment a bit and see if this was a set-up to "show how mean Virginia is" or something, I decided to test my theory. My theory of how this set-up was being done was that: Using these little "I'm an innocent guy who read a dianetics book and who is sincerely interested in scientology" covers, who then have *someone*, usually curious about, respond with supposedly sincere theta, KNOWING that I know what BOTH are up to and what their agenda is, and will come in and not play along with their 1.1 game. A little parallel vectoring, or attempting to use my motion, or even better, acting a bit like the fringe on snoopy's scarf, as I said to Freethought2 on the old board when Freethought2 tried to use my motion. So, this whole thread tonight smelled, starting with the title "theta" (DUMB choice-Freethought2 already tried that) so.......I dropped some bait, in the form of mentioning Logic18, and how he falls for ridiculous posts like Tom's message from Tom thread. Figuring, well, if this is ANY kind of a setup, then logic18 (who hasn't been posting much the last few days), would go right for it, and offer the whole comm cycle up to the world as "proof" of whatever he decides it's "proof Virginia is....". I had a 70/30 split that he wouldn't be THAT easy to bait, but he was. Check the FZINT board and ACT. And it sure didn't take him long to go for the bait either. So to all who contributed, thanks for making it easy to show your true colors. Not to mention the entertainment of watching Logic18 try to turn his mind into a pretzel, yet again, over on FZINT. Oh, and one more thing. Sorry, it's for agents only.. Lower cone of silence ........................... "The Parrot has left Virginia, and flown to his new home." ............................ Raise cone of silence. Virginia |
