|
Why policy is relevent Author: Tom Posted: Tues Dec 05 2000 07:23 am A lot of freezoners agree that policy is irrelevent and that progression on the bridge is enough. The reason that LRH policy is relevent is that It is a current existing structure(much like Federal law) which is well constructed, and if understodd, is on your side. Otherwise it's like saying "Why worry that someone is perverting the laws, when you can run from the cops". ON THE OTHER HAND LOTS OF FREEZONERS FEEL THAT THEY SHOULD MAKE CASE GAIN BEFORE DEALING WITH THE BIG HEAVY BATTLES. Good point, but keep in mind that the longer we wait to take responsiblity for the situation, the stronger the enemy grows. and there is something that can be done to win the battle. If you sit in the middle of a war, and you don't be a soldier, it is an overt act of ommission. People used to know this. Remeber when people used to join wars out of duty?In this case the soldiers duty is sending some letters, disseminate truth. Author: Blork Posted: Tues Dec 05 2000 07:03 pm Hi Tom! Would you like to volunteer to be "cannon fodder"? Author: Tom Posted: Wed Jan 31 2001 09:05 am From Keeping Scientology Working The only thing you can be upbraided for by students or pcs is "no results." Trouble spots occur only where there are "no results." Attacks from governments or monopolies occur only where there are "no results" or "bad results." THIS IS VERY AGREEABLE TO ME. MAYBE SOME OF THE PEOPLE WHO OBJECT TO KSW HAVE OVERLOOKED THIS LINE. it also explains why the freezone exists at all. Because "No auditting" falls into the catagory of "no results". Bad or "make wrong"auditting falls into that catagory. Author: Vector Posted: Thur Feb 01 2001 07:51 pm Very good and valid point Tom. I had completely forgotten this line. It makes so much sense to me. i wonder how many other peole it will make sense to here? |
