Mailing List Posts : Re: [COSinvestigations] Re: A Warning

Re: [COSinvestigations] Re: A Warning
From wisdom@c... Fri Jul 21 10:51:34 2000
Return-Path: <wisdom@c...>
Received: (qmail 18200 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2000 17:51:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
 by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 21 Jul 2000 17:51:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO citrine.cyberstation.net) (205.167.0.5)
 by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2000 17:51:34 -0000
Received: from default (63-147-106-71.cyberstation.net [63.147.106.71])
 by citrine.cyberstation.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)
 with SMTP id MAA08465 for <COSinvestigations@egroups.com</a>>;
 Fri, 21 Jul 2000 12:51:32 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20000721124925.008272f0@c...>
X-Sender: wisdom@c...
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 12:49:25 -0500
To: COSinvestigations@egroups.com</a>
Subject: Re: [COSinvestigations] Re: A Warning
In-Reply-To: <5b.8e148dc.26a9e574@a...>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "Alan C. Walter" <wisdom@c...>

At 01:42 PM 7/21/00 EDT, you wrote:
>In a message dated 07/21/2000 8:26:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
>wisdom@c... writes:
> 
> Well I would suggest you take your head out of the past and look at the
> future consequences of the Ethics, Tech and Admin not only of Scio, but the
> Independents as well.
> 
> Alan
> >>
>
>Hi Alan, you kinda changed the subject. Do you have data about LRH's other 
>lives to continue your discussion about LRH being suppressive?

No I did not change the subject.

The question was: Was LRH an SP?

Or was he PTS?

Or just completely ARCX Broken?

LRH thought long term futures spanning many future lives as should we.

The consequences of what we do now sets our future existences in place.

Alan