Newsgroup Postings : FZAOINT tech

FZAOINT tech
From: Ralph Hilton <aon.912202928@aon.at>
Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
Subject: FZAOINT tech
Date: 13 Jul 2001 20:37:10 -0400
Organization: [clear-l] Art Matrix - Lightlink Electra Gateway V2.6
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <dg2vktooif3ag35rmkml8t6pfmcc95tp1c@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.34.12
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.34.20
X-Original-Trace: 13 Jul 2001 20:37:14 -0400, 205.232.34.20


There has been a fair bit of controversy over the issue of applying LRH tech
or mixing it.

I wish to apply LRH tech.

>From that I understand that one can address any of the LRH tech to any
target.

People may wish to write up rundowns. They might be for particular cases.

I have observed degrees of suppression from some areas and have written up
handlings which align with the scn axioms.

I will have to say to people openly that the tech I wish is apply to their
case is either exactly the words of LRH or an extension from the Axioms and
Logics and basic auditing principles.

New processes are ok as long as they are backed up very fully by LRH
references and are subject to extensive testing and the PC knows what they
are getting.

There has been some controversy here after Pilot's post about SofM.

The criticism of Pilot and the FZAOINT has been at a rather low tone level
but nevertheless I see that there are points of truth there.

I see no choice but to ask Ken Ogger to apply a condition of Doubt.

I would ask him to decide whether or not he wishes to apply standard tech or
to mix it in his post as Snr C/S FZAOLA.

I would ask him to either make a public statement to use only LRH tech on
post or resign.

I ask that his statement include that his will not use any SofM or other
tech in C/Sing but that he will apply standard tech to all cases.

The existing bridge works. It just hasn't been applied.

I admit that I have my own faults of misapplication.

As far as I am concerned we are working toward putting the bridge there as
LRH intended.

So, Ken, I have to ask for a public statement that you will apply LRH tech
standardly on post without additives or your resignation as Snr C/S FZAOLA.

Given the circumstances that is the lightest appropriate ethics gradient.

Ralph Hilton
Snr C/S FZAOINT