Newsgroup Postings : Re: To: Alan Walter

Re: To: Alan Walter
From: Alan Walter <wisdom@cyberstation.net>
Subject: Re: To:  Alan Walter
Date: 1998/02/04
Message-ID: <34D8EBEF.CC89EC12@cyberstation.net>#1/1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6b7e1b$o3m@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: wisdom@cyberstation.net
To: John Alexander <Alexandex@worldnet.att.net>,
 homer <clear-l@lightlink.com>,
 "greenzone-list@flash.net" <greenzone-list@flash.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Cyberstation, Inc.
Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology



John Alexander wrote:

> One of my areas of curiosity is the history of the evolution of
> processing
> technology which occurred during the early to mid sixties, some of
> which you
> have touched upon in your postings on BPC handling and in other areas.
>
> I got tremendous benefit from Jack's teaching of  that material,  as
> did
> many others I knew then, and I have always been rather mystified that
> the
> materials have seemed to drop off the edge of the earth.

The period you have pin pointed is possibly the most crucial moment in
Scio's and LRH's time track.

I have very vivid recall of that moment, as do several other SHBC's
grads. It occurred during a lecture on GPM's. One moment he was
lecturing about GPM's the next he was into Study and the Misunderstood
Word.

It caused a "shock" to most of us in the audience. It was in June 1964.

In the Tech volumes you can notice the gap from 27 May 1964 to 29 June
1964 in his Tech writings.

From this period onward Scio and the Tech began to change character
dramatically.

There are possibly many reasons for this.

One of them being the quality of students on the Briefing Course. Most
of the experienced veterans had gone home. What was now arriving were
the failed cases from the Orgs and the field.

The May June period was also a time when LRH was in a huge Ascension
state. Life magazine was going to do an in depth coverage of Scio and
LRH. This ended in a complete disaster as it tore Scio and LRH to
pieces. The title of the article was "You can be a Boo Hoo!"

My observation was this totally "shocked and ARC broke" LRH. And "the
shock,  the ARC break and the AE" were never handled.

From this time onward Scio began to change from a safe subject to a
Domination - Subjugation subject.

It appears that from that period on LRH went opterm to the world.

It also should be noted he began to get "kicked out of spaces."
Everywhere he went there were huge upsets, and the environment would
order him out. That phenomena usually occurs because of someone is
putting forth too many wrong indications, out lists, wrong items causing
area or environmental BPC.

> For example, even
> in the "Pilot's" Super Scio, the chapter on "actual GPMs" seems to be
> written in complete ignorance of what GPMs had become in maybe the
> last year
> or two of their research.

A few of us continued on with the GPM research, but it never was quite
the same. Much of the GPM tech has been omitted from the volumes and
courses.

> Further, I have not been able to identify any continuity between that
> material and the Clearing Course which I believe came out right
> afterwards,
> in about 1965.

It was not meant to be. It was a gradient step to solo processing. Ron
knew as well as most who had run GPM Tech that Implant GPM's were a
shadow of the charge, force or mass in relation to what actual GPM's and
Reliable Items contained.

From the point of view of learning how to solo process, the CC was a
great step forward. As for causing clears......it leaves much to be
investigated.

> Just to try to develop some personal reality on the subject
> I did finally run the CC a few passes through this last summer - it
> ran OK ,
> but I didn't get anywhere the level of insight, gains etc. that I got
> from
> running GPMs or, for that matter, running Clean Slate on the
> Knowledgism
> glossary terms.   In my experience, running the CC was more like
> running the
> telephone directory.

I personally do not use any of the Tech developed from that period on.
But if someone gets wins using that tech I do not stop its use either.

To say the least, the later tech. contains a tremendous amount of
misdirection, omitteds, and tends to by-pass handling mass and force.
Possibly the most serious consequences contained in the later Tech is it
stopped extensive regular processing. It substituted other solutions
(Ethics, etc.) to handling what were previously, though lengthy
handlings, very effective at producing long term if not permanent
results.

Processing an area to full erasure is vastly superior to trying to force
ethics in over the top of the charge, force and mass.

Alan