Newsgroup Postings : Re: Compassion

Re: Compassion
From: ralph@hilton.org (Ralph Hilton)
Subject: Re: Compassion
Date: 1998/09/05
Message-ID: <3603a547.315487500@news.telekabel.at>#1/1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <35eea88b.54140566@news.telekabel.at>
 <6sjpqb$qg8$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: 5 Sep 1998 04:41:32 +0100, 212.17.110.140
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Ralph@Hilton.org
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology


On Wed, 02 Sep 1998 15:55:54 GMT, indigo@dangerous-minds.com wrote:


>
>I know I'm a newcomer to ARS, Ralph.  And I largely respect the tenor and
>measure of your posts.I'd love it if you could take the time to explain
>where you stand with Scn, its subject matter, and what you've held close to,
>and what you've discarded.
>
>And, naturally, I invite other Scientologists to join the conversation.
>
>My best to you,

I see many things wrong with scn.

The first is ethics. One has to let a person resolve their own ethics.

If a person's awareness of ethics is such that it creates a danger to others
then it is necessary to use Justice.

These things, in the CofS exist both in dept. 3 which is a mish mash.

Ethics belongs in Div 5.

Justice in Div 1.

Security checks are excessive.

The "bridge" is too rote.

Prices are unreasonable.

I have a fair degree of psychic perception. When I look at the photos in the
latest "Advance" and "Scientology News"  I see lost souls.

The biggest problem is that they are not delivering what they promised.
--

Ralph Hilton
http://Ralph.Hilton.org