: Some Dare Call it Conspiracy

Some Dare Call it Conspiracy
Monday, November 05, 2001 - 03:20 pm 

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Vast,
Thanks for the detailed reply. What I've observed with many people
who follow Bill Robertson's approach is that all he says seems to be
accepted as gospel truth. I observed a number of outpoints in his
work. I posted a few of them recently but no-one seemed willing to
address them.

My earlier posts about his alter-is of a NOTs issue and RTS would be
the ones I would be interested in comments on.

To take RTS first:

In the manuscript there is the statement:

"The panel itself was a maze of jackplugs and the brightly lit names
of the Galactic Confederation member stars: Sirius, Canopus, Alpha
Centauri, Vega, Capella,
Arcturus, Rigel, Procyon, Achernar, Beta Centauri, Altair,
Betelgeuse, Acrux, Aldebaran, Pollux, Spica, Antares, Fomalhaut,
Deneb, Regulus and Sol."

In my atronomy book the brightest stars visible from Earth are listed
in sequence as:
Sirius, Canopus, Alpha Centauri, Arcturus, Vega, Capella,
Rigel, Procyon, Achernar, Betelgeuse, Beta Centauri, Altair,
Aldebaran, Acrux, Antares, Spica, Fomalhaut, Pollux, Deneb, Beta
Crucis, Regulus.

Doesn't it seem strange to you that the stars of the federation are
20 of the 21 1st magnitude stars visible from Earth in almost the
exact sequence given in astronomy texts?

My data can be crosschecked on
http://www.e-z.net/~haworth/constel/brightstars.html

I have studied Bill's work in detail and run the levels up through
OT16. I would agree that there are many gains on them. However I do
feel that there is a lot of case to be handled that is not covered in
the material up to OT16 , in the Super Static C/S course, tech
briefings 1-14 or in the other upper level materials I have studied.
I do know that I am missing a part of his material but not pertaining
to anything covered in SSC/S data.

I know that quite a few people can extend their perception out and
get in communication with a being they perceive as LRH. Many on upper
levels have done this. However they often get differing realities.

The bottom line is that I accept a lot of Bill's work as useful but
not that it is standard LRH tech. I know that some terminals try to
assert a viewpoint by stating that it isn't yet real to others.
Telepathic communication is very real to me. However, I have reached
a point where I do not accept apparent certainties. So while certain
perceptions may appear real and certain earlier on, I have found that
with further auditing on goes through harmonics of realities and
unrealities, agreements and disagreements and that there are many of
these phases to go through. This is covered quite well in the PDC
lectures.

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8

iQA/AwUBO+bni2kmQi6s7A3hEQIGBgCgxDy0WONo9N5s43xieaL+wijOy9wAoNGt
Y+MH0ormZl7TlW0FQ8vs/DoD
=r0by
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----