Newsgroup Postings : Pilot Self-Clearing Not Recommended

Pilot Self-Clearing Not Recommended
Path: newscene.com!newscene!newscene!novia!novia!nf3.bellglobal.com!sjcppf01!
usenetserver.com!newsfeeder.randori.com!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!
gail.ripco.com!news.lightlink.com!news2.lightlink.com
From: "Mike McClaughry" <charlis@icehouse.net>
Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology
Subject: Pilot Self-Clearing Not Recommended
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:48:07 -0800
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 93
Message-ID: <3c10493b@news2.lightlink.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.34.12
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.53.142.81
X-Original-Trace: 6 Dec 2001 23:44:43 -0500, 207.53.142.81
Xref: newscene.com alt.clearing.technology:157502

From: Mike McClaughry

Re: Pilot's Self-Clearing Procedure


The Pilot's Self- Clearing procedure is not recommended because it violates
the basics of auditing.

Self-auditing the grades denies preclears the gains that are only available
from having another audit you.

Self-auditing does not produce tone arm action - as Ron states in the
following reference:


Level 0 tape 6 February 1964 The communication cycle in auditing-LRH

"If you look over communication, you'll find out that the magic of
communication is about the only thing that makes auditing work. And if you
could sit down to a meter-a one-hand electrode-all by yourself and run some
process on yourself, it'd make a citizen out of you. And the reason it'd
make a citizen out of you, is you would see a little bit of tone arm action
at first, or if you tripped across something like an active, loud, large
GPM, why, you might get yourself a quarter or a half a tone arm division, or
a couple of needle flashes."

".....Now, the amount of tone arm action you would get doing this would make
you blink, because it's none."

"...Now, the reason for this has to do with the thetan in this universe.
Now, he has begun to consider himself MEST, and he's begun to consider
himself mass. And the being who considers himself mass, of course, responds
to the laws of electronics and the laws of Newton, and is actually incapable
of generating very much, you see, or-which is what we're interested
in-as-ising very much. That's not very much going to disappear there in the
way of mass."

"....Now I have had to explore this particular field of
auditing --self -auditing, because most anybody does it, and so forth--and
what was this all about......."

"...But the same GPM, run with the same items and so forth would produce
upwards to 175 TA divisions, down. And the GPM, self-audited, produced 2."

".....it tells us that an individual considers himself Mesty, or massy, if
you see, and therefore he has to have a second terminal. And a second
terminal is required to discharge the energy."


End of quote and now this is Mike talking live again....


Self auditing violates another law that makes auditing work:

THE AUDITOR PLUS THE PC IS GREATER THAN THE PRECLEARS BANK
THE PC MINUS THE AUDITOR IS LESS THAN THE PRECLEARS BANK


Now, some people falsely think that Solo Auditing is self-auditing. No, you
are NOT auditing yourself in Solo auditing, you are auditing another Being.
Therefore, you still have TWO terminals, an auditor and a pc, and the law of
auditing is in place, therefore it works.

Personally, I think it is a betrayal of Beings to tell them to Solo audit
the grades as in Pilot's "Self- Clearing" procedure. It denies them all the
case gain they could have had if they did it the only way it works, by
having another person audit you on the Grades. You will end up in the same
case condition as the Pilot, with your case wrapped around your head, all
restimulated and not handled, and in a mess.

The above is just one of many methods being used in the so-called Freezone
to sabotage the tech into unworkability. There are people in the Freezone
who purposefully take advantage of other people's lack of training and
understanding of the tech, all in the effort to deny case gain and prevent
anyone going OT. My advice is to avoid them like the plague. You can easily
spot who they are because they have a common denominator of stating, one way
or the other, that LRH tech does not work, and they advise you doing it some
other way than what LRH issues tell you to do.

One day, I will make known all of the specifics on how the tech has been
sabotaged into unworkability, both inside and outside of the Church. Until
then, you would be well-advised to follow LRH issues exactly. You'll be glad
you did.

ARC,

Mike