: Re: Freezone - clarification of nomenclature

Re: Freezone - clarification of nomenclature
From: deirdre@sover.net (Deirdre)
Subject: Re: Freezone - clarification of nomenclature
Date: 1996/08/10
Message-ID:  <deirdre-1008961606300001@pm0a16.new.sover.net>#1/1
references:  <320cb3b6.0@orac.idiscover.net>
organization: Not Hardly
newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology

 

Ralph, you are misinformed.

I am in no way connected with Captain Bill's organization, past or present
(see: http://www.freezone.org), but I consider myself a free zoner. Note
the difference: capital letters for the organization, lower case for those
at large not a member of "Freie Zone, e.V.".

In general, fz people think there is some benefit to auditing or some of
Hubbard's materials, but are not adverse to leaving out parts of Hubbard's
works they think don't work. Nor are they adverse to using techniques from
other persons and other disciplines.

In the free zone at large, you have people who still consider themselves
Scientologists even though the CofS would disagree.

_Deirdre

In article  <320cb3b6.0@orac.idiscover.net>,
ralph@xenologics.idiscover.co.uk (Ralph Hilton) wrote:

>         The "Freezone" is a term coined by W. B. Robertson, a former high
> ranking Sea Org member. The following is a statement he issued
> relating to the creation of the "Freezone". Generally people who have
> left the church and practice scientology in some form or another refer
> to themselves as "Independent Scientologists" or by the name of their
> own offshoot group and prefer not to be associated with Robertson's
> somewhat unusual set of beliefs. I don't know of anyone who posts to
> a.r.s. that is part of the "Freezone" as detailed below.
>         "Elron Elray" is the name W.B.R. uses for Hubbard.
 
-- 
http://www.sover.net/~deirdre