: Re: Common Voice

Re: Common Voice
From: Joe Harrington  <joeharr@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Common Voice
Date: 1996/12/30
Message-ID:  <19961231043718.AAA18161@LOCALNAME>#1/1
sender: electra@light.lightlink.com
organization: Art Matrix - Lightlink Electra Gateway v2.4
newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology

 

billong@juno.com wrote:
>
>On Mon, 30 Dec 1996 07:23:20 -0500 (EST) Heidrun Beer  <concern@atnet.at>
>writes:
>>billong@juno.com wrote:
>> 
>>> Question?  Does the term "Free Zone" have any special, like time 
 track,
>>> meaning to it ? Does it have to be used in a name for any reason?  I 
 am
>>> looking for data here to see if there is any reason not to change 
>>it.
>> 

As best I understand, The "Free Zone" was first used by Capt Bill 
Robinson when he created his WorldWide OT Committee, which he stated
was operating under the auspices of LRH, in 1982. Bill developed his
own version of NOTS, which he attributed to the telepathic inspiration
of LRH . The  RON's Org network did pretty well over in Europe, until
OSA crushed it. I believe the remnants of it are in Germany at this 
time and operate under the auspices of the Free Zone Assn in Hamburg, 
or Munich? 

In my view, Bill got caught up in the Xenu cosmology of OT3 and added 
his own spin to it, and embarked on a massive manhunt to recapture this 
galactic villian and put him back in that electronic box that he 
escaped from. His adventures are detailed in the Teegeeack and the 
Sector9 materials, which are in the Free Zone web files.

So if people want to called themselves "FreeZoners", the roots can 
be traced back to the life and legend of Capt Bill.

People who wish to use "Scientology" or some derivation of it will 
have to deal with any stigma attached to that name, its Founder, and 
any actions of persons associated with it, past or present. Personally
I think "Free Zone" and "Scientology" are more of any asset than 
a liability, irregardless of the MANY good things that came from the 
man, and the subject. Thats just the way it is.

Joe